An argument in favor of lowering the legal drinking age to 18 years in the united states

Finally, lowering the drinking age to 18 would stop infantilizing college students, but it would probably kill more of them in traffic accidents in 2006, 2,121 people ages 16 to 20 died in alcohol-related fatalities on us roads, according to data compiled for me by the national highway traffic safety administration in 1984, the figure was. In the united states, calls for lowering the drinking age have sounded for a rather long time considering that alcohol can lead to unpredictable behavior and other negative social consequences, the drinking age should not be lowered. The united states should not lower its drinking age to 18 there was a reason many years ago that the age limit was changed to 21 at 18 the person is just not mature enough and responsible enough to go out and drink.

Minimum legal drinking age (mlda) laws specify the legal age when an individual can purchase or publicly consume alcoholic beverages the mlda in the united states is 21 years however, prior to the enactment of the national minimum drinking age act of 1984, the legal age when alcohol could be purchased varied from state to state 1. Pro: the minimum legal drinking age should be lowered 1 18 is the age of adulthood in the united states, and adults should have the right to make their own decisions about alcohol consumption. The drinking age in the united states (21), adopted in 1984, is one of the highest in the world countries that compare in severity are only a few, including indonesia, kazakhstan, cameroon, oman.

With the legal drinking age being 21, there are 3 years that a person is an adult where they have certain activities restricted, which may be considered a restriction of a right there are some definite advantages and disadvantages to lowering the drinking age to 18. An argument supporting lowering the drinking age citing that alcohol-related issues persist regardless of age and 18-year-olds should have the right to drink. New hampshire, minnesota and california have been reviewing pieces of legislation that would bring their state laws in line with much of the rest of the world’s – which would mean lowering the legal drinking age from 21 to 18. In the united states, young individuals must be of 21 years of age to drink alcohol it is illegal for those under 21, and the punishment for breaking this law can be significant. The main argument in support of higher legal drinking age is that it helps to reduce road accidents caused by the dunked youth however, if road safety is really the focal concern, then it is more helpful to rise the legal driving age.

Lowering the legal drinking age: an analysis of the pros and cons background since the mid 1930’s, the legal drinking age in the united states has been set at 21 but during the vietnam war, in consideration of young people in military service, 29 states lowered the legal drinking age arguments for lowering the drinking age. The lower minimum legal drinking age was followed by increases in the sale and consumption of alcohol and in alcohol-involved traffic fatalities, particularly among young adults aged 18–20 years 12–14 on the basis of these unintended health consequences of the lower drinking age, some states reinstated the minimum legal drinking age of 21. Since states began setting the legal drinking age at 21, the law has been one of the most studied in our history the evidence is overwhelming: more than 50 high-quality scientific studies all.

The biggest argument for lowering the drinking age is that drinking should simply be a basic right for an adult, which includes 18-year-olds as seen in the picture above, the vast majority of countries in the world allow for drinking at 18 years old or even younger. According the proconcom, there are many pros and cons about this topic, which causes a lot of uproar in debates a lot of people debate this topic with good reason below are five pros & cons to this argument pros of lowering the legal drinking age: since 18 is the legal age of adulthood in. Dwight b heath knows what he is about to say will sound a little crazy to most people. Second, the argument about developing brains is key because lowering the drinking age brings us out of that 21 - 25 gap 21 is a better bet report this vote vote placed by socialpinko 7 years ago.

  • Princeton, nj -- thirty years after federal legislation established 21 as a uniform minimum age to drink alcohol in all states, americans are widely opposed to lowering the legal drinking age to 18 seventy-four percent say they would oppose such legislation, while 25% would favor it.
  • But the college presidents got what they wanted: a national debate about the drinking age when the age was raised to 21 in the mid-1980s, the goal was to reduce highway fatalities.

Debaters return it to 18, and enforce it gabrielle glaser, author, her best-kept secret: why women drink raising the drinking age to 21 hasn't reduced drinking -- it’s merely driven it. Many states lowered the drinking age to 18 or 19 in the early 1970s, around the same time as the passage of the 26th amendment granting 18-year-olds the right to vote but then all 50 states raised it again to 21 when congress passed the national minimum drinking age act — for fear of losing a portion of federal highway money. - many people can make a convincing argument that the drinking age in the united states should be lowered from twenty-one to eighteen years old the legal drinking age should not be lowered there are many good reasons why the legal drinking age should not be lowered, such as our collective safety and our individual health.

an argument in favor of lowering the legal drinking age to 18 years in the united states Essay about should the united states lower the drinking age to 18 - the legal age limit to drink in the us is 21 years old currently even though the legal age limit is 21 to drink, there are many people who are abusing this law and drinking illegally.
An argument in favor of lowering the legal drinking age to 18 years in the united states
Rated 4/5 based on 22 review